![]() |
![]() Selected Government Addresses and Speeches |
Budget Address For Fiscal Year 2005/2006
‘Towards Growth
and Social Protection’
By
The
Honourable Roosevelt Skerrit
Prime
Minister and Minister for Finance, Planning
National Security and Overseas Nationals
Madam Speaker, Cabinet
Colleagues, Members of this Honourable House, Fellow Dominicans.
Last year, in this House,
in my Budget Address delivered on 29th June 2004, I pleaded with the
Nation to consolidate the gains that our country had made during 2003/04.
Contrary to the fiscal and economic outcome of the previous year, our country
had witnessed a stabilising of the fiscal situation. The year 2003 had also
witnessed a reversal of the declines in economic growth that had been
registered in 2001/02, and the fiscal situation had begun to show signs of
improvement.
However, Government was
aware that these were early days yet, and while there was a basis for
satisfaction and relief considering our performance in 2002/03, the gains that
we had made could easily be frittered away, if we did not consolidate those
gains by continuing to demonstrate prudent and disciplined management of the
national economy.
As I will indicate
shortly, Government has continued to do what is right by the economy. Fiscal
year 2004/05 shows an improved performance over the previous year. We have
satisfactorily consolidated our gains, and must continue to move on, placing
greater emphasis on the generation of sustained economic growth.
May I say that the most
important step that the people of this country have taken to consolidate those
gains has been to return this Government to office.
Our people have recognised
the tremendous gains our country made under the stewardship of this Government,
taking into account the difficult inheritance that had been bestowed on us, and
have decided to give us an opportunity to continue the good work. I extend
gratitude and congratulations to the people of this country for your vote of
confidence. I do so particularly on behalf of the late Hon. Pierre Charles of
blessed memory, whose role in taking the courageous decision to embark on our
programme of economic stabilisation and adjustment, must never be allowed to be
forgotten.
The challenge during this
fiscal year can be summarised as: continuing to improve the macroeconomic
environment as a necessary precondition to increased economic growth, and
otherwise facilitating private investment. We will achieve this objective by:
I will elaborate on these
strategies in the course of this Budget Address.
For the second year
running, I am proud to report to this House that past sacrifices have not been
in vain. Indeed I am in a position to report an improved economic performance
over last year. During last year’s Budget Address I reported that our country
had turned the corner. I said further, “As we predicted, confidence in our
country had returned. Dominica had acquired the image of one willing to help
itself. Donors have been sympathetic to our cause. The economic situation had
begun to improve.”
Our country registered
growth of 3.57% in 2004 as compared with a growth performance of 0.1% the
previous year. The growth in 2004 was broad-based, with tourism and
transportation being the larger contributors to this overall performance. Agriculture, communications,
construction and services sector were also important contributors.
Indications for the first
half of this calendar year remain encouraging – our country is on track to
sustain the growth performance of 2004 into 2005 – indeed subject to weather
patterns and other external factors, Dominica is on track to exceed last year’s
growth performance.
The public finances have
continued the upward trend that I reported in last year’s Budget Address. Revenues increased from $234.9 million
in 2003/04 to an estimated $242.9 million in 2004/05. As shown in Chart 1, our
revenue lines reflect a continuous upward movement, while recurrent expenditure
reflects an initial tendency to increase, but with a subsequent decline since
2003/04, reflective of our improving fiscal performance. Both the sales tax and
taxes on international trade show continuous upward movement since 2002/03, an
especially encouraging development given that these two are useful proxies for
the level of economic activity in our country.
In sum, the current
account balance has improved steadily from negative $39.4 million in 2001/02 to
a surplus of $30.8 million in 2004/05.
As regards capital
expenditure, $62.2 million was spent on implementing the public sector
investment programme, as compared with a budgeted $88.7 million. This shortfall
in capital spending was due mainly to issues of capacity in the ministries
concerned, and also the rate of disbursement of donor funds to support major
capital projects, notably the Dominica Social Investment Fund. The satisfactory
growth performance recorded to date would have been even higher if these
limitations had not inhibited the rate of implementation of the capital
programme.
Regarding the issue of
capacity, and based on the outcome of the recent Donors Meeting on Dominica,
Government will be following up with formal approaches to agencies and friendly
Caribbean countries for technical support with a view to more efficient
implementation of the public sector investment programme.
Chart 1

As I indicated last year,
the ‘primary balance’ is the critical fiscal indicator under the ongoing
arrangement with the International Monetary Fund. (It is defined as total
revenues minus total expenditures net of interest payments). Government is in a
position to report successful attainment of the 3% (of GDP) primary surplus
target in fiscal 2004/05. This compares with a primary deficit of 1.6% of GDP
in 2002/03 and a primary surplus of close to 1.7% in 2003/04. In fact the
primary surplus in 2004/05 was close to 4%.
This improvement in our
fiscal position is a significant achievement. It represents the outcome of a
process of disciplined economic management, characterized by prudence and
fiscal responsibility, and careful attention to the public debt. It should not
have escaped the attention of members of this House and the public at large,
that the improvement in the country’s growth performance has more or less
coincided with the improvement in the country’s public finances. We had
promised the country that the stabilisation programme was intended to put our
fiscal situation in order, as a basis for achieving economic growth. I am pleased to report that the
programme has been vindicated. What is left for us to do is continue the fiscal
vigilance, even as we press on with programmes and policies that will sustain
the growth.
So that this Budget
reflects continuation of the fiscal imperative that good economic management
requires.
The major planks of the
fiscal framework going forward continue to be the public debt, the wage bill
and the critical fiscal target, the primary surplus. Consistent with this
macro-economic framework, the public investment programme for 2005/06 will be
kept at an upper limit of 10.5% of GDP, and the share of the Public Sector
Investment Programme (PSIP) to be financed through borrowing to a limit
of 14.5% of the capital programme for the fiscal year. These are the
prudential parameters that frame this year’s Budget. Observance of these parameters will see our country safely
through the next year, in terms of fiscal performance, economic growth and debt
restraint.
Government is committed to
maintaining a responsible fiscal stance into the medium term. The policy is to
target a minimum primary surplus of 3% of GDP and to continue on the path of
debt and fiscal sustainability. In so doing we will be creating the conditions
for sustaining the growth performance at a minimum of 3% into the medium term.
The
Primary Surplus
As I indicated earlier,
the centerpiece of our macro-economic framework into the medium term is the
‘primary surplus’ target, which we have set at 3% of GDP over the medium term.
This target is the minimum that is required to attain eventual debt
sustainability. Notwithstanding, the country still has a very high level of
debt, and debt servicing continues to be burdensome in terms of the country’s
revenue generation capacity. Government must therefore continue to limit its
debt, and make adequate provision for debt servicing and arrears reduction.
Size
of Government
We have heeded the
warnings of expert observers that the wage bill continues to be a source of
concern in our forward movement. At $106.5 million or 13.7% of GDP, Dominica’s
wage bill is very high by any standards, and Government will continue to work
to reduce it further as a percentage of GDP.
The intention is to make
the public service more efficient, and less involved in the provision of
services that the private sector can provide. The objective is for our country,
over time, to have a relatively smaller, more efficient and better paid public
service, as well as an expanding private sector.
Reduction in the size of
Government will be achieved through streamlining of Government offices and
outsourcing of Government services. The actions that will be taken in the
course of fiscal 2005/06 with a view to these objectives will consist of the
following:
In the pursuit of these
actions, Government has already begun to ensure the fullest possible
sensitisation of those persons to be affected, as well as the provision of
technical support to the process, with a view to a smooth transition to the new
arrangements. This will, of necessity, include dialogue with the relevant
unions. Preliminary discussions with groups of workers to be affected by this
decision, suggest that they are not averse to the proposals for outsourcing,
and Government is gratified by the generally positive response that they have
provided.
Government is optimistic
that those services to be outsourced will be provided by new companies that are
started by the affected employees, or by companies from which Government will
seek undertakings to employ the affected workers. Government will lend every possible support to the affected
employees in the establishment of private companies, or in such other ways as
may be appropriate. Government
will assist in the following areas: training, preparation of business plans,
book-keeping and business counselling. Our objective is that no deserving
worker will remain unemployed as a consequence of outsourcing.
In addition, to the
foregoing specific measures, Government will keep under review the scope for
streamlining, commercialising or privatising other services.
Finally, the ongoing work
coordinated by the Establishment, Personnel and Training Division on public
sector reform will continue, with a view to streamlining the structure and
functioning of Government ministries and departments.
Redundancy costs arising
from the decision to outsource services previously provided by Government will
be met through budgetary support resources to be provided under the E.U.’s
Framework for Mutual Obligations (FMO).
This FMO could be signed as early as the end of this month, with the
funds becoming available by this September.
Public
Debt
Government’s prudent
management of the public debt has contributed in no small measure to the
manifest improvement in the country’s growth performance. We reported to the
Nation in June 2003 that after accounting for debt servicing and personal
emoluments, (including retirement benefits), there was only eight cents left in
the dollar to pay for goods and services and contribute to the counterpart
financing necessary to implement the public investment programme. Last June, I reported that Government’s
fiscal measures would increase this figure to 15 cents in the dollar. The
budget for 2005/2006 will further improve this figure to 29 cents in the
dollar, yet another index of the improved fiscal and economic health of our
blessed land.
These improvements are
possible because we have both reduced the Government’s wage bill and reduced
the debt burden. It bears repeating that this Government has been careful in
incurring debt and such debt as it has incurred since 2000, has been on terms
that are concessional and consistent with agreed fiscal parameters. It must be
stated that some increase in debt was inevitable, given the parlous state of
Government finances following the earlier period of imprudent management. We
have been very open about the debt that has been incurred since February 2000
when we took office. The total new external debt contracted was $278.1 million.
It may be worth noting that this total amount has not yet been fully disbursed.
As is evident in the Appendix, most of these debts were incurred on
concessional terms, and most of them were necessarily incurred in support of
the programme of economic stabilisation and adjustment. It is therefore these
very debts that have contributed to rescuing the economy of Dominica from the
economic crisis that was the inheritance of this Government.
Total Central Government
debt now stands at $632.6, $438.9 million (or 69.4%) of this external, and
$193.6 million (or 30.4%) domestic. The ratio of debt to GDP (excluding
guarantees in favour of statutory corporations) stands at 81.1%, which is
still high by accepted standards. However thanks to the Government’s debt
restructuring programme, the ratio of debt service to recurrent revenue has
been reduced from 22.1% at the end of June 2003 to 15.4% at end June
2005.
Improvement in the Government's fiscal and
debt position is also reflected in the state of arrears, as recorded in unpaid
cheques. These declined from $58.4 million to $34.4 million or by 58.9% over
the past two years. Unpaid cheques to Dominica Social Security have declined
from $35.8 million in June 2003 to $28.3 million in June 2005. This amount will
be further reduced to about $10.0 million on finalisation of the debt
restructuring with DSS. Another indicator of our improved financial condition
is the Government’s overdraft balance. As at June 2005 the balance on the overdraft had been
reduced to zero ($0), compared with a balance of $59.9 million in June 2003.
Before leaving this subject, I wish to
thank all those creditors who have participated in Dominica’s debt
restructuring programme. They have been true partners in development. To those
creditors that are still holding out, you have the assurance of Government’s
continued willingness to engage you. We continue to service your debt by making
payments into an escrow account at the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank, pending
completion of our negotiations.
Enough for the time being about the results
of the stewardship of this Government over the past five years. Suffice it to
say that the record is clear; and that all the indicators are pointing in the
right direction.
The Budget for 2005/06 is
consistent with the fiscal parameters that I identified earlier. As will be seen
at Table 1 of the printed text of my Address, Government is projecting
recurrent revenue at $234.3 million and budgeting for recurrent expenditure[1]
at $214.2 million, thus making for a projected current account surplus of $20.1
million during this fiscal year.
Table 1. Budget Summary, 2005/06 ($m)
|
Items |
Estimates 2005/2006 |
Approved Estimates 2004/2005 |
Prelim. Actual 2004/2005 |
|
Current Revenue |
234.3 |
216.1 |
242.7 |
|
Recurrent
Exp. (excl. debt amort’n) |
214.2 |
208.4 |
211.9 |
|
Current Account Surplus |
20.1 |
7.7 |
30.8 |
|
Debt amortisation |
12.6 |
4.8 |
8.8 |
|
Capital Revenue Local Grants Loans |
76.8 1.5 63.5 11.8 |
88.4 3.0 64.6 20.9 |
31.2 1.9 8.0 21.2 |
|
Capital Expenditure Local Grants Loans |
82.0 6.7 63.4 11.8 |
88.8 3.3 64.6 2.0.9 |
62.3 6.4 38.6 17.2 |
|
Overall Balance (Deficit) |
2.3 |
2.6 |
(9.1) |
Recurrent
Expenditure
The recurrent expenditure
projection for 2005/06 is $214.2 million. This compares with preliminary actual
expenditure during 2004/05 of $211.9 million. The wage bill is budgeted at
$106.5 million, a figure reflects both the reinstatement of the salaries
reduction effected in July 2003, and at the same time Government’s commitment
to keep the wage bill in check.
An amount of $20.3 million
has been provided to meet interest payments. This represents $9.4 million less
than that budgeted for 2004/05. It takes into account the benefits from the
debt restructuring, and also includes amounts paid into the escrow account at
the Central Bank to meet interest payments of creditors with whom negotiations
are continuing.
Government transfers are
budgeted at $43.9 million, and include $20.8 million for grants and
contributions to local, regional and international
institutions, $3.4million for public assistance and $19.7 million for
pensions and gratuities. The budgeted amount for transfers represents $7.3
million more than the amount budgeted for 2004/05, due in part to provision for
a large number of retirees whose files are at various stages of
processing. The amount for
transfers also includes $2.3 million as a result of the transfer of State
College teachers from the Government’s payroll to that of the College, and an
increased allocation for contributions to regional and international
institutions.
Table 2. Budgeted Recurrent
Expenditure by Economic Classification 2005/06,($m)
|
Classification |
2005/2006 |
% |
2004/2005 |
% |
|
Personal emoluments |
94.7 |
41.8 |
92.6 |
0.43 |
|
Wages |
7.7 |
3.4 |
7.0 |
3.3 |
|
Salaried allowances |
4.9 |
2.2 |
4.0 |
1.9 |
|
Non-salaried allowances |
6.3 |
2.8 |
5.6 |
2.6 |
|
Interest |
20.2 |
8.9 |
29.7 |
13.9 |
|
Retiring benefits |
19.7 |
8.7 |
16.2 |
7.6 |
|
Grants &
Contributions |
20.8 |
9.2 |
16.7 |
7.8 |
|
Subsidies (Public
assistance) |
3.4 |
1.5 |
3.6 |
1.7 |
|
Refunds |
1.5 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
0.7 |
|
Goods & Services |
34.9 |
15.4 |
31.4 |
14.7 |
|
Loan repayments |
12.6 |
5.6 |
4.8 |
2.3 |
|
Total |
226.8 |
100 |
213.2 |
100 |
The summary of recurrent
expenditure by economic classification plus debt amortisation, as shown in
Table 2, reveals that personal emoluments, wages, salaried and non-salaried
allowances together add up to $113.6 million or 50.1% of the total, and debt
repayment (interest and amortisation) $32.8 million or 14.5%. We have however
been able to factor in an increased allocation to goods and services over last
year -- $34.5 million compared with $31.3 million.
Recurrent
Revenue
Revenue collection in some
areas was above projections. This applies to corporate income tax, property
taxes and the sales tax. However, Government’s revenue projections for 2005/06
are conservative, given the need for caution regarding the sustainability of
some of these collections. Current
revenue for 2005/06 is projected to be $234.2 million, compared with $216.1
million budgeted for 2004/05.
Table 3. Breakdown of
Budgeted Recurrent Revenue ($m)
|
Item |
05/06 |
% |
04/05 |
% |
|
Personal Income Tax |
29.9 |
12.8 |
26.8 |
12.4 |
|
Corporate Tax |
9.5 |
4.1 |
6.9 |
3.2 |
|
Int’l Trade Taxes |
93.7 |
40.0 |
102.5 |
47.4 |
|
Sales Tax |
26.4 |
11.3 |
30.0 |
13.9 |
|
VAT |
22.6 |
9.6 |
- |
- |
|
Other Domestic Taxes |
29.7 |
12.7 |
25.8 |
12.0 |
|
Non-tax Revenue |
22.5 |
9.6 |
24.1 |
11.1 |
|
Total |
234.3 |
100 |
216.1 |
100 |
The main sources of
revenue are projected to be: personal income tax, $29.9 million, corporate
income tax, $9.5 million, international trade taxes, $93.7 million, and the
sales tax, $26.4 million. A more detailed breakdown of these estimates
is, of course, available from the Draft Estimates that have been circulated to
all members of this House. A summary is also presented at Table.
In summary the current
revenue projection for fiscal 2005/06 is $234.2 million, against a current
expenditure projection of $214.2 million, making for a current account surplus
of $20.1 million. Indeed, taking recurrent and capital estimates into account,
as indicated in the Budget Summary at Table 1, we are projecting an overall
surplus of $2.3 million. This
picture confirms the claims of this Government that our economy is continuing
on an upward course – a conclusion that is reflected in both the fiscal numbers
and the growth performance. It is also a reflection of the careful husbanding
of the resources of our country, and this Government’s responsible approach to
controlling expenditure, and incurring of debt.
Members of the House will
view with interest Chart 2. It shows the interplay between debt, growth and the
primary fiscal target, (the primary surplus) for the years between 1991 and
fiscal 2004/05. The Chart shows that there is a clear negative correlation
between the level and trajectory of debt on the one hand, and the fiscal and
growth performance on the other. The test of good economic management is in the
balance that is struck between these three variables, and I am pleased to
indicate again that on all the evidence, this Government is doing something
right!
Chart 2

The generation of economic
activity, economic growth and ensuring social protection of the less fortunate,
have always been the priorities of this Government, as we articulated that in
last years budget. This statement continues to capture the objectives of this
Government. We have also been
saying over the past three years that “… the purpose of embarking on a
programme of economic stabilisation was precisely in order to give our country
a better chance of economic recovery”. The evidence is clear: we continue to
witness a return to economic growth, even as our country’s fiscal position has
stabilised.
Government is now in a
position to give greater impetus to the growth process in our country. We will
do this within the broad vision enunciated in last year’s Budget Address, and
in a manner consistent with the pledge contained in the 2005 manifesto of the
Dominica Labour Party. This Government
embraces:
“A vision for
our country as a place characterized by a people empowered to contribute to
their own well –being and that of our country, through policies of Government
geared to facilitating an environment within which private enterprise can
flourish to the benefit of our people.”
This Government is fully
committed to pursuing this vision for our country, as indeed we are committed
to pursuing over the next five years, the goals and pledges set out in the
Labour Party’s Manifesto. We have in the pipeline a set of public investment
projects that will take us, year by year, towards the goals we have set out for
our country; and we will be giving necessary emphasis to improving the business
environment, even as we work diligently to bring down levels of poverty all
over our country.
Growth
and Social Protection Strategy
It had been announced
previously that Government had embarked on putting together a medium-term
Growth and Social Protection Strategy (GSPS) document. This document provides
the over-arching framework for economic development and poverty reduction in
our country over the next five years. It is the framework that informs the
medium-term public investment programme, the medium-term macro-economic
framework, and indeed the budget that I have the honour to present today.
In other words the GSPS
provides an articulated sense of direction and purpose for our country and
Government, to the end of this decade. It is Government’s intention
to update the Strategy on an annual basis so that the document will be in the
nature of a ‘rolling’ plan that takes account of changing circumstances and
therefore will be of continuing relevance.
Let there be no doubt that
poverty reduction is a major concern of this Government.
In the absence of an
up-to-date poverty assessment, there is no basis for recent assertions that
poverty levels in Dominica have increased as a result of the economic
stabilisation programme. Government is aware however, that poverty reduction
needs to be the direct focus of economic and social policy. The GSPS takes the
position that the surest way to tackle poverty is through attainment of high
levels of economic growth that is as far as possible widely distributed across
the country.
It targets a sustained 3%
rate of growth over the medium term, based on increased levels of activity in
all sectors, and in particular in tourism, agriculture, fisheries, energy and
water. It is in this sense that the GSPS provides a comprehensive and
integrated framework for policy formulation over the medium term.
The GSPS recognises that
even with high levels of economic growth, there will be the need for targeted
measures of social protection. In fact expert findings are that Dominica’s
social protection measures are generally adequate, but that there is the need
for better targeting of these measures. Government has already begun to give
attention to this matter and to review its social protection measures, with a
view to targeting them more efficiently to deserved groups of persons. In fact,
Government has approached the UNDP with a view to carrying out a survey of
living conditions in Dominica, to provide better information on levels of
poverty in our country, and its regional and social distribution. This survey
will take place before the end of this calendar year and its results will
inform the nature and shape of social policy going forward.
The Growth and Social
Protection Strategy has benefited from a number of stakeholder consultations,
and is to be discussed at a final national consultation before being presented
to the Cabinet for formal adoption. After this it will be published and made
available to the public as part of a transparent process of national
governance.
The
Public Sector Investment Programme
The public investment
programme is cast within the frame of the medium term framework to which I
spoke earlier. The PSIP for 2005/06 will be capped at $82.0 million (or 10.5%
of GDP), and is to be financed by a combination of loans (14.4%), grants
(77.3%) and domestic financing (8.2%).
Looking ahead to the next
three years, our calculations point to a projected level of capital
expenditure, though the PSIP, of just under$300 million over the next three
years.
During the last fiscal
year (2004/05), delays in disbursement of some funds impacted negatively on the
implementation of projects such as the Dominica Social Investment Fund (DSIF)
and the Petite Soufriere/Rosalie Road among others. The Petite Soufriere Road project was a casualty of a
decision by the donor agency, the EU, and Government, to include this project
within a wider initiative to improve the road network in Dominica as a
whole. This larger project will
now include enhancement of the technical capacity of the Public Works Garage to
maintain Dominica’s road network, as well as construction of the Petite
Soufriere/Rosalie Road. The financing agreement for this project could be
signed before the end of this calendar year.
May I recall some of the
major projects completed or commenced in fiscal year 2004/05.
ü The Marigot
Fisheries Improvement Project was completed at a cost of EC$33,869,962.00. This
Project is expected to make a major contribution to the local availability of
fish in this country, and to contribute to increased national output and export
earnings.
ü During the year
we witnessed the expansion of the Portsmouth Secondary School at a total cost
of $439,646.00; the expansion of the Isaiah Thomas Secondary School at a cost
of $150,000.00; and the rehabilitation of the Marigot Secondary School at a
cost of $250,575.00.
ü Work on the
first phase of the Dominica Grammar School Project was nearing completion. $1.5 million was spent on this project
during fiscal 2004/05.
ü An amount of
$500,000.00 was expended on the Youth Empowerment Employment Programme.
ü Sea defense
work was completed at Guelle Lion and Anse Cola at a cost of $15.4 million;
ü The
Pottersville to Deep Water Harbour Road Reinstatement Project was completed at
a cost of EC$3.4 million;
ü Dominicans were
pleased and relieved to see work on the Windsor Park Stadium commence. During
the last fiscal year, design work on the Windsor Park Stadium was completed at
a cost of $2.5 million;
ü Finally,
Dominicans would also have been pleased to see work started on the upgrade and
expansion of the Melville Hall Airport. During the past fiscal year,
expenditure on this project was $2.1 million.
The rate of implementation
of the capital programme is crucial to our country’s ability to sustain and
improve on its growth performance. Government will be seeking to speed up the
rate of implementation of its capital programme, especially as this relates to
major projects, by establishing a Project Implementation Coordination Unit in
the Office of the Prime Minister. This Unit will be funded by the E.U. and is indicative
of Government’s determined approach to project implementation, and to the
generation of growth and employment in our country. This new Unit will become
operational by the end of this calendar year.
This Budget Address
contains tabular summaries of the PSIP for 2005/06 by Government Ministries and
by major projects, at Tables 4 and 5, and Chart 3 contains the breakdown by
economic classification.