DAAS Logo

Selected Government Addresses and Speeches

Budget Address For Fiscal Year 2005/2006

‘Towards Growth and Social Protection’

By

The Honourable Roosevelt Skerrit

Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Planning

National Security and Overseas Nationals

 

Introduction

 

Madam Speaker, Cabinet Colleagues, Members of this Honourable House, Fellow Dominicans.

 

Last year, in this House, in my Budget Address delivered on 29th June 2004, I pleaded with the Nation to consolidate the gains that our country had made during 2003/04. Contrary to the fiscal and economic outcome of the previous year, our country had witnessed a stabilising of the fiscal situation. The year 2003 had also witnessed a reversal of the declines in economic growth that had been registered in 2001/02, and the fiscal situation had begun to show signs of improvement.

 

However, Government was aware that these were early days yet, and while there was a basis for satisfaction and relief considering our performance in 2002/03, the gains that we had made could easily be frittered away, if we did not consolidate those gains by continuing to demonstrate prudent and disciplined management of the national economy.

 

As I will indicate shortly, Government has continued to do what is right by the economy. Fiscal year 2004/05 shows an improved performance over the previous year. We have satisfactorily consolidated our gains, and must continue to move on, placing greater emphasis on the generation of sustained economic growth.

 

May I say that the most important step that the people of this country have taken to consolidate those gains has been to return this Government to office.

 

Our people have recognised the tremendous gains our country made under the stewardship of this Government, taking into account the difficult inheritance that had been bestowed on us, and have decided to give us an opportunity to continue the good work. I extend gratitude and congratulations to the people of this country for your vote of confidence. I do so particularly on behalf of the late Hon. Pierre Charles of blessed memory, whose role in taking the courageous decision to embark on our programme of economic stabilisation and adjustment, must never be allowed to be forgotten. 

 

The challenge during this fiscal year can be summarised as: continuing to improve the macroeconomic environment as a necessary precondition to increased economic growth, and otherwise facilitating private investment. We will achieve this objective by:

 

I will elaborate on these strategies in the course of this Budget Address.

 

Recent Economic Performance

 

For the second year running, I am proud to report to this House that past sacrifices have not been in vain. Indeed I am in a position to report an improved economic performance over last year. During last year’s Budget Address I reported that our country had turned the corner. I said further, “As we predicted, confidence in our country had returned. Dominica had acquired the image of one willing to help itself. Donors have been sympathetic to our cause. The economic situation had begun to improve.”

 

Our country registered growth of 3.57% in 2004 as compared with a growth performance of 0.1% the previous year. The growth in 2004 was broad-based, with tourism and transportation being the larger contributors to this overall performance.  Agriculture, communications, construction and services sector were also important contributors. 

 

Indications for the first half of this calendar year remain encouraging – our country is on track to sustain the growth performance of 2004 into 2005 – indeed subject to weather patterns and other external factors, Dominica is on track to exceed last year’s growth performance.

 

The public finances have continued the upward trend that I reported in last year’s Budget Address.  Revenues increased from $234.9 million in 2003/04 to an estimated $242.9 million in 2004/05. As shown in Chart 1, our revenue lines reflect a continuous upward movement, while recurrent expenditure reflects an initial tendency to increase, but with a subsequent decline since 2003/04, reflective of our improving fiscal performance. Both the sales tax and taxes on international trade show continuous upward movement since 2002/03, an especially encouraging development given that these two are useful proxies for the level of economic activity in our country.

 

In sum, the current account balance has improved steadily from negative $39.4 million in 2001/02 to a surplus of $30.8 million in 2004/05.

 

As regards capital expenditure, $62.2 million was spent on implementing the public sector investment programme, as compared with a budgeted $88.7 million. This shortfall in capital spending was due mainly to issues of capacity in the ministries concerned, and also the rate of disbursement of donor funds to support major capital projects, notably the Dominica Social Investment Fund. The satisfactory growth performance recorded to date would have been even higher if these limitations had not inhibited the rate of implementation of the capital programme.

 

Regarding the issue of capacity, and based on the outcome of the recent Donors Meeting on Dominica, Government will be following up with formal approaches to agencies and friendly Caribbean countries for technical support with a view to more efficient implementation of the public sector investment programme.

 

Chart 1

   

As I indicated last year, the ‘primary balance’ is the critical fiscal indicator under the ongoing arrangement with the International Monetary Fund. (It is defined as total revenues minus total expenditures net of interest payments). Government is in a position to report successful attainment of the 3% (of GDP) primary surplus target in fiscal 2004/05. This compares with a primary deficit of 1.6% of GDP in 2002/03 and a primary surplus of close to 1.7% in 2003/04. In fact the primary surplus in 2004/05 was close to 4%.

 

This improvement in our fiscal position is a significant achievement. It represents the outcome of a process of disciplined economic management, characterized by prudence and fiscal responsibility, and careful attention to the public debt. It should not have escaped the attention of members of this House and the public at large, that the improvement in the country’s growth performance has more or less coincided with the improvement in the country’s public finances. We had promised the country that the stabilisation programme was intended to put our fiscal situation in order, as a basis for achieving economic growth.  I am pleased to report that the programme has been vindicated. What is left for us to do is continue the fiscal vigilance, even as we press on with programmes and policies that will sustain the growth. 

 

Macro-economic Framework

 

So that this Budget reflects continuation of the fiscal imperative that good economic management requires.

 

The major planks of the fiscal framework going forward continue to be the public debt, the wage bill and the critical fiscal target, the primary surplus.   Consistent with this macro-economic framework, the public investment programme for 2005/06 will be kept at an upper limit of 10.5% of GDP, and the share of the Public Sector Investment Programme (PSIP) to be financed through borrowing to a limit of 14.5% of the capital programme for the fiscal year. These are the prudential parameters that frame this year’s Budget.  Observance of these parameters will see our country safely through the next year, in terms of fiscal performance, economic growth and debt restraint.

 

Government is committed to maintaining a responsible fiscal stance into the medium term. The policy is to target a minimum primary surplus of 3% of GDP and to continue on the path of debt and fiscal sustainability. In so doing we will be creating the conditions for sustaining the growth performance at a minimum of 3% into the medium term.

 

The Primary Surplus

 

As I indicated earlier, the centerpiece of our macro-economic framework into the medium term is the ‘primary surplus’ target, which we have set at 3% of GDP over the medium term. This target is the minimum that is required to attain eventual debt sustainability. Notwithstanding, the country still has a very high level of debt, and debt servicing continues to be burdensome in terms of the country’s revenue generation capacity. Government must therefore continue to limit its debt, and make adequate provision for debt servicing and arrears reduction.

 

Size of Government

 

We have heeded the warnings of expert observers that the wage bill continues to be a source of concern in our forward movement. At $106.5 million or 13.7% of GDP, Dominica’s wage bill is very high by any standards, and Government will continue to work to reduce it further as a percentage of GDP.

 

The intention is to make the public service more efficient, and less involved in the provision of services that the private sector can provide. The objective is for our country, over time, to have a relatively smaller, more efficient and better paid public service, as well as an expanding private sector.

 

Reduction in the size of Government will be achieved through streamlining of Government offices and outsourcing of Government services. The actions that will be taken in the course of fiscal 2005/06 with a view to these objectives will consist of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

In the pursuit of these actions, Government has already begun to ensure the fullest possible sensitisation of those persons to be affected, as well as the provision of technical support to the process, with a view to a smooth transition to the new arrangements. This will, of necessity, include dialogue with the relevant unions. Preliminary discussions with groups of workers to be affected by this decision, suggest that they are not averse to the proposals for outsourcing, and Government is gratified by the generally positive response that they have provided.

 

Government is optimistic that those services to be outsourced will be provided by new companies that are started by the affected employees, or by companies from which Government will seek undertakings to employ the affected workers.  Government will lend every possible support to the affected employees in the establishment of private companies, or in such other ways as may be appropriate.  Government will assist in the following areas: training, preparation of business plans, book-keeping and business counselling. Our objective is that no deserving worker will remain unemployed as a consequence of outsourcing.  

 

In addition, to the foregoing specific measures, Government will keep under review the scope for streamlining, commercialising or privatising other services.

 

Finally, the ongoing work coordinated by the Establishment, Personnel and Training Division on public sector reform will continue, with a view to streamlining the structure and functioning of Government ministries and departments.

 

Redundancy costs arising from the decision to outsource services previously provided by Government will be met through budgetary support resources to be provided under the E.U.’s Framework for Mutual Obligations (FMO).  This FMO could be signed as early as the end of this month, with the funds becoming available by this September.

 

Public Debt

 

Government’s prudent management of the public debt has contributed in no small measure to the manifest improvement in the country’s growth performance. We reported to the Nation in June 2003 that after accounting for debt servicing and personal emoluments, (including retirement benefits), there was only eight cents left in the dollar to pay for goods and services and contribute to the counterpart financing necessary to implement the public investment programme.  Last June, I reported that Government’s fiscal measures would increase this figure to 15 cents in the dollar. The budget for 2005/2006 will further improve this figure to 29 cents in the dollar, yet another index of the improved fiscal and economic health of our blessed land.

 

These improvements are possible because we have both reduced the Government’s wage bill and reduced the debt burden. It bears repeating that this Government has been careful in incurring debt and such debt as it has incurred since 2000, has been on terms that are concessional and consistent with agreed fiscal parameters. It must be stated that some increase in debt was inevitable, given the parlous state of Government finances following the earlier period of imprudent management. We have been very open about the debt that has been incurred since February 2000 when we took office. The total new external debt contracted was $278.1 million. It may be worth noting that this total amount has not yet been fully disbursed. As is evident in the Appendix, most of these debts were incurred on concessional terms, and most of them were necessarily incurred in support of the programme of economic stabilisation and adjustment. It is therefore these very debts that have contributed to rescuing the economy of Dominica from the economic crisis that was the inheritance of this Government.

 

Total Central Government debt now stands at $632.6, $438.9 million (or 69.4%) of this external, and $193.6 million (or 30.4%) domestic. The ratio of debt to GDP (excluding guarantees in favour of statutory corporations) stands at 81.1%, which is still high by accepted standards. However thanks to the Government’s debt restructuring programme, the ratio of debt service to recurrent revenue has been reduced from 22.1% at the end of June 2003 to 15.4% at end June 2005.

 

Improvement in the Government's fiscal and debt position is also reflected in the state of arrears, as recorded in unpaid cheques. These declined from $58.4 million to $34.4 million or by 58.9% over the past two years. Unpaid cheques to Dominica Social Security have declined from $35.8 million in June 2003 to $28.3 million in June 2005. This amount will be further reduced to about $10.0 million on finalisation of the debt restructuring with DSS. Another indicator of our improved financial condition is the Government’s overdraft balance.   As at June 2005 the balance on the overdraft had been reduced to zero ($0), compared with a balance of $59.9 million in June 2003.

 

Before leaving this subject, I wish to thank all those creditors who have participated in Dominica’s debt restructuring programme. They have been true partners in development. To those creditors that are still holding out, you have the assurance of Government’s continued willingness to engage you. We continue to service your debt by making payments into an escrow account at the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank, pending completion of our negotiations. 

 

Budget 2005/06

 

Enough for the time being about the results of the stewardship of this Government over the past five years. Suffice it to say that the record is clear; and that all the indicators are pointing in the right direction.

 

The Budget for 2005/06 is consistent with the fiscal parameters that I identified earlier. As will be seen at Table 1 of the printed text of my Address, Government is projecting recurrent revenue at $234.3 million and budgeting for recurrent expenditure[1] at $214.2 million, thus making for a projected current account surplus of $20.1 million during this fiscal year.

 

Table 1.   Budget Summary, 2005/06 ($m)

 

Items

Estimates

2005/2006

Approved Estimates

2004/2005

Prelim. Actual

2004/2005

Current Revenue

234.3

216.1

242.7

Recurrent Exp. (excl. debt amort’n)

214.2

208.4

211.9

Current Account Surplus

20.1

7.7

30.8

Debt amortisation

12.6

4.8

8.8

Capital Revenue

   Local

   Grants

   Loans

76.8

1.5

63.5

11.8

88.4

3.0

64.6

20.9

31.2

1.9

8.0

21.2

Capital Expenditure

   Local

   Grants

   Loans

82.0

6.7

63.4

11.8

88.8

3.3

64.6

2.0.9

62.3

6.4

38.6

17.2

Overall Balance (Deficit)

2.3

2.6

(9.1)

 

Recurrent Expenditure

 

The recurrent expenditure projection for 2005/06 is $214.2 million. This compares with preliminary actual expenditure during 2004/05 of $211.9 million. The wage bill is budgeted at $106.5 million, a figure reflects both the reinstatement of the salaries reduction effected in July 2003, and at the same time Government’s commitment to keep the wage bill in check. 

 

An amount of $20.3 million has been provided to meet interest payments. This represents $9.4 million less than that budgeted for 2004/05. It takes into account the benefits from the debt restructuring, and also includes amounts paid into the escrow account at the Central Bank to meet interest payments of creditors with whom negotiations are continuing.

 

Government transfers are budgeted at $43.9 million, and include $20.8 million for grants and contributions to local, regional and international institutions, $3.4million for public assistance and $19.7 million for pensions and gratuities. The budgeted amount for transfers represents $7.3 million more than the amount budgeted for 2004/05, due in part to provision for a large number of retirees whose files are at various stages of processing.  The amount for transfers also includes $2.3 million as a result of the transfer of State College teachers from the Government’s payroll to that of the College, and an increased allocation for contributions to regional and international institutions.

 

Table 2. Budgeted Recurrent Expenditure by Economic Classification 2005/06,($m)

 

Classification

2005/2006

%

2004/2005

%

Personal emoluments

94.7

41.8

92.6

0.43

Wages

7.7

3.4

7.0

3.3

Salaried allowances

4.9

2.2

4.0

1.9

Non-salaried allowances

6.3

2.8

5.6

2.6

Interest

20.2

8.9

29.7

13.9

Retiring benefits

19.7

8.7

16.2

7.6

Grants & Contributions

20.8

9.2

16.7

7.8

Subsidies (Public assistance)

3.4

1.5

3.6

1.7

Refunds

1.5

0.7

1.5

0.7

Goods & Services

34.9

15.4

31.4

14.7

Loan repayments

12.6

5.6

4.8

2.3

Total

226.8

100

213.2

100

 

The summary of recurrent expenditure by economic classification plus debt amortisation, as shown in Table 2, reveals that personal emoluments, wages, salaried and non-salaried allowances together add up to $113.6 million or 50.1% of the total, and debt repayment (interest and amortisation) $32.8 million or 14.5%. We have however been able to factor in an increased allocation to goods and services over last year -- $34.5 million compared with $31.3 million.

 

Recurrent Revenue

 

Revenue collection in some areas was above projections. This applies to corporate income tax, property taxes and the sales tax. However, Government’s revenue projections for 2005/06 are conservative, given the need for caution regarding the sustainability of some of these collections.  Current revenue for 2005/06 is projected to be $234.2 million, compared with $216.1 million budgeted for 2004/05.

 

Table 3. Breakdown of Budgeted Recurrent Revenue ($m)

 

Item

05/06

%

04/05

%

Personal Income Tax

29.9

12.8

26.8

12.4

Corporate Tax

9.5

4.1

6.9

3.2

Int’l Trade Taxes

93.7

40.0

102.5

47.4

Sales Tax

26.4

11.3

30.0

13.9

VAT

22.6

9.6

-

-

Other Domestic Taxes

29.7

12.7

25.8

12.0

Non-tax Revenue

22.5

9.6

24.1

11.1

Total

234.3

100

216.1

100

 

The main sources of revenue are projected to be: personal income tax, $29.9 million, corporate income tax, $9.5 million, international trade taxes, $93.7 million, and the sales tax, $26.4 million.  A more detailed breakdown of these estimates is, of course, available from the Draft Estimates that have been circulated to all members of this House. A summary is also presented at Table.

 

In summary the current revenue projection for fiscal 2005/06 is $234.2 million, against a current expenditure projection of $214.2 million, making for a current account surplus of $20.1 million. Indeed, taking recurrent and capital estimates into account, as indicated in the Budget Summary at Table 1, we are projecting an overall surplus of $2.3 million.  This picture confirms the claims of this Government that our economy is continuing on an upward course – a conclusion that is reflected in both the fiscal numbers and the growth performance. It is also a reflection of the careful husbanding of the resources of our country, and this Government’s responsible approach to controlling expenditure, and incurring of debt.

 

Members of the House will view with interest Chart 2. It shows the interplay between debt, growth and the primary fiscal target, (the primary surplus) for the years between 1991 and fiscal 2004/05. The Chart shows that there is a clear negative correlation between the level and trajectory of debt on the one hand, and the fiscal and growth performance on the other. The test of good economic management is in the balance that is struck between these three variables, and I am pleased to indicate again that on all the evidence, this Government is doing something right!

 

Chart 2

 

Towards Economic Growth and Job Creation

 

The generation of economic activity, economic growth and ensuring social protection of the less fortunate, have always been the priorities of this Government, as we articulated that in last years budget. This statement continues to capture the objectives of this Government.  We have also been saying over the past three years that “… the purpose of embarking on a programme of economic stabilisation was precisely in order to give our country a better chance of economic recovery”. The evidence is clear: we continue to witness a return to economic growth, even as our country’s fiscal position has stabilised.

 

Government is now in a position to give greater impetus to the growth process in our country. We will do this within the broad vision enunciated in last year’s Budget Address, and in a manner consistent with the pledge contained in the 2005 manifesto of the Dominica Labour Party.  This Government embraces:

 

“A vision for our country as a place characterized by a people empowered to contribute to their own well –being and that of our country, through policies of Government geared to facilitating an environment within which private enterprise can flourish to the benefit of our people.”

 

This Government is fully committed to pursuing this vision for our country, as indeed we are committed to pursuing over the next five years, the goals and pledges set out in the Labour Party’s Manifesto. We have in the pipeline a set of public investment projects that will take us, year by year, towards the goals we have set out for our country; and we will be giving necessary emphasis to improving the business environment, even as we work diligently to bring down levels of poverty all over our country.

 

Growth and Social Protection Strategy

 

It had been announced previously that Government had embarked on putting together a medium-term Growth and Social Protection Strategy (GSPS) document. This document provides the over-arching framework for economic development and poverty reduction in our country over the next five years. It is the framework that informs the medium-term public investment programme, the medium-term macro-economic framework, and indeed the budget that I have the honour to present today.

 

In other words the GSPS provides an articulated sense of direction and purpose for our country and Government, to the end of this decade.   It is Government’s intention to update the Strategy on an annual basis so that the document will be in the nature of a ‘rolling’ plan that takes account of changing circumstances and therefore will be of continuing relevance.

 

Let there be no doubt that poverty reduction is a major concern of this Government.

 

In the absence of an up-to-date poverty assessment, there is no basis for recent assertions that poverty levels in Dominica have increased as a result of the economic stabilisation programme. Government is aware however, that poverty reduction needs to be the direct focus of economic and social policy. The GSPS takes the position that the surest way to tackle poverty is through attainment of high levels of economic growth that is as far as possible widely distributed across the country.

 

It targets a sustained 3% rate of growth over the medium term, based on increased levels of activity in all sectors, and in particular in tourism, agriculture, fisheries, energy and water. It is in this sense that the GSPS provides a comprehensive and integrated framework for policy formulation over the medium term.

 

The GSPS recognises that even with high levels of economic growth, there will be the need for targeted measures of social protection. In fact expert findings are that Dominica’s social protection measures are generally adequate, but that there is the need for better targeting of these measures. Government has already begun to give attention to this matter and to review its social protection measures, with a view to targeting them more efficiently to deserved groups of persons. In fact, Government has approached the UNDP with a view to carrying out a survey of living conditions in Dominica, to provide better information on levels of poverty in our country, and its regional and social distribution. This survey will take place before the end of this calendar year and its results will inform the nature and shape of social policy going forward.

 

The Growth and Social Protection Strategy has benefited from a number of stakeholder consultations, and is to be discussed at a final national consultation before being presented to the Cabinet for formal adoption. After this it will be published and made available to the public as part of a transparent process of national governance.

 

The Public Sector Investment Programme

 

The public investment programme is cast within the frame of the medium term framework to which I spoke earlier. The PSIP for 2005/06 will be capped at $82.0 million (or 10.5% of GDP), and is to be financed by a combination of loans (14.4%), grants (77.3%) and domestic financing (8.2%).

 

Looking ahead to the next three years, our calculations point to a projected level of capital expenditure, though the PSIP, of just under$300 million over the next three years.

 

During the last fiscal year (2004/05), delays in disbursement of some funds impacted negatively on the implementation of projects such as the Dominica Social Investment Fund (DSIF) and the Petite Soufriere/Rosalie Road among others.  The Petite Soufriere Road project was a casualty of a decision by the donor agency, the EU, and Government, to include this project within a wider initiative to improve the road network in Dominica as a whole.  This larger project will now include enhancement of the technical capacity of the Public Works Garage to maintain Dominica’s road network, as well as construction of the Petite Soufriere/Rosalie Road. The financing agreement for this project could be signed before the end of this calendar year.

 

May I recall some of the major projects completed or commenced in fiscal year 2004/05.

 

ü       The Marigot Fisheries Improvement Project was completed at a cost of EC$33,869,962.00. This Project is expected to make a major contribution to the local availability of fish in this country, and to contribute to increased national output and export earnings.

 

ü       During the year we witnessed the expansion of the Portsmouth Secondary School at a total cost of $439,646.00; the expansion of the Isaiah Thomas Secondary School at a cost of $150,000.00; and the rehabilitation of the Marigot Secondary School at a cost of $250,575.00.

 

ü       Work on the first phase of the Dominica Grammar School Project was nearing completion.  $1.5 million was spent on this project during fiscal 2004/05.

 

ü       An amount of $500,000.00 was expended on the Youth Empowerment Employment Programme.

 

ü       Sea defense work was completed at Guelle Lion and Anse Cola at a cost of $15.4 million;

 

ü       The Pottersville to Deep Water Harbour Road Reinstatement Project was completed at a cost of EC$3.4 million;

 

ü       Dominicans were pleased and relieved to see work on the Windsor Park Stadium commence. During the last fiscal year, design work on the Windsor Park Stadium was completed at a cost of $2.5 million;

 

ü       Finally, Dominicans would also have been pleased to see work started on the upgrade and expansion of the Melville Hall Airport. During the past fiscal year, expenditure on this project was $2.1 million.

 

The rate of implementation of the capital programme is crucial to our country’s ability to sustain and improve on its growth performance. Government will be seeking to speed up the rate of implementation of its capital programme, especially as this relates to major projects, by establishing a Project Implementation Coordination Unit in the Office of the Prime Minister. This Unit will be funded by the E.U. and is indicative of Government’s determined approach to project implementation, and to the generation of growth and employment in our country. This new Unit will become operational by the end of this calendar year. 

 

This Budget Address contains tabular summaries of the PSIP for 2005/06 by Government Ministries and by major projects, at Tables 4 and 5, and Chart 3 contains the breakdown by economic classification.